Skip to document

Sgtaweek 9 solution

Sgtaweek 9 solution
Subject

Statistical Mathematics

4 Documents
Students shared 4 documents in this course
DegreeGrade

HSC

12
Academic year: 2024/2025
Uploaded by:
0followers
3Uploads
0upvotes

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Linear Regression – Part 2 © Copyright Macquarie University 20 20 1

Linear Regression – Part 2

In this exercise we will:

 Use Excel output to assess the relationship between two numerical variables.

 Use the coefficient of determination to measure the proportion of variation in the

dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable.

 Use the correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the linear

relationship between two numerical variables.

 Use the equation of the Least Squares Regression line to make predictions.

Research Question: Is there a relationship between BMI and systolic blood pressure?

Systolic blood pressure is a measure of the amount of pressure in the arteries during the

contraction of the heart muscle. The Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m 2 and systolic blood

pressure in mmHg were measured for a sample of 22 adult males between the ages of 30

and 45 years. Output from the regression analysis in Excel is given below:

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics

Multiple R 0.

R Square 0.

Adjusted R Square 0.

Standard Error 6.

Observations 22

ANOVA

df SS MS F Significance F

Regression 1 544 544 11 0.

Residual 20 944 47.

Total 21 1489.

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%

Intercept 74 15 4 0 41 106.

BMI 2 0 3 0 0 3.

Linear Regression – Part 2 © Copyright Macquarie University 20 20 2

Assessing a linear relationship between two numerical variables

1. Use the information provided to determine whether BMI is a useful predictor of systolic

blood pressure.

Note: For this exercise, suppose that all assumptions required for linear regression are

satisfied.

Hypothesis Test:

H 𝐇𝟎: 𝜷𝟏 = 𝟎 𝐇𝟏: 𝜷𝟏 ≠ 𝟎

A We are told that all assumptions relating to linear regression have been

satisfied.

T 𝒕 = 𝟑. 𝟑𝟗𝟓 with 𝐝𝐟 = 𝟐𝟐 − 𝟐 = 𝟐𝟎

P p-value = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟐𝟗

D We reject the null hypothesis since the p-value < 0.

C There is a significant positive linear relation between BMI and systolic blood

pressure in adult males between the ages of 30 and 45 years. For each

additional unit of BMI, systolic blood pressure increases by 2 mmHg, on

average.

2. What is the numerical value of the coefficient of determination, R 2?

𝟎. 𝟑𝟔𝟓𝟕

3. Interpret the meaning of R 2

37% of the variability in systolic blood pressure can be explained by BMI.

4. What is the numerical value of the correlation coefficient, r?

+√𝟎. 𝟑𝟔𝟓𝟕 = 𝟎. 𝟔𝟎𝟒𝟕

5. Interpret the meaning of r.

There is a moderate positive correlation between BMI and systolic blood pressure.

Was this document helpful?

Sgtaweek 9 solution

Subject: Statistical Mathematics

4 Documents
Students shared 4 documents in this course
DegreeGrade:

HSC

12
Was this document helpful?
Linear Regression Part 2 © Copyright Macquarie University 2020 1
Linear Regression Part 2
In this exercise we will:
Use Excel output to assess the relationship between two numerical variables.
Use the coefficient of determination to measure the proportion of variation in the
dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable.
Use the correlation coefficient to measure the strength and direction of the linear
relationship between two numerical variables.
Use the equation of the Least Squares Regression line to make predictions.
Research Question: Is there a relationship between BMI and systolic blood pressure?
Systolic blood pressure is a measure of the amount of pressure in the arteries during the
contraction of the heart muscle. The Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m2 and systolic blood
pressure in mmHg were measured for a sample of 22 adult males between the ages of 30
and 45 years. Output from the regression analysis in Excel is given below:
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.60469
R Square 0.36566
Adjusted R Square 0.33394
Standard Error 6.87323
Observations 22
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 544.6274281 544.6274281 11.52861551 0.002871778
Residual 20 944.8271173 47.24135587
Total 21 1489.454545
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%
Intercept 74.22500769 15.47881821 4.795263223 0.000110208 41.93675871 106.5132567
BMI 2.171245908 0.639470383 3.395381498 0.002871778 0.837334063 3.505157753