Skip to document

Practice question Norma Basil and Sergio

tort law duty of care practice question
Module

Law of Tort (LAW209)

523 Documents
Students shared 523 documents in this course
Academic year: 2022/2023
Uploaded by:
Anonymous Student
This document has been uploaded by a student, just like you, who decided to remain anonymous.
University of Liverpool

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

LAW209 Week 3

Duty of Care Problem Question ‘Diner break-in and candles at bathtime’

Your advice has been sought in relation to the following incidents:

a) Norma owns a restaurant called the Double R Diner. Several weeks ago, PC Wiggum

arrested Snake in connection with a series of robberies perpetrated against restaurants in Mallardshire. When PC Wiggum was putting Snake in the back of the police car, he carelessly failed to lock the door, and when the car stopped at a traffic light on its way to the police station, Snake escaped. The following night Snake broke into the Double R Diner. During the break-in, Snake caused substantial property damage and injured Norma.

Terry, Norma’s husband, discovered his wife on the kitchen floor and rang for an ambulance. The call handler told him ‘not to worry; and that an ambulance was ‘on its way.’ It took over an hour for the ambulance to arrive, by which time Norma’s injuries had significantly worsened. Snake’s whereabouts are currently unknown.

b) A fire broke out at Sergio’s home, after his new lodger left an aromatic candle unattended by

the bath before leaving the house.

Max, a police officer at the local police station around the corner, had popped out to buy something for lunch when he saw Sergio run out of the front door onto the roadside and smoke escaping from an upstairs window. Sergio had left his mobile phone inside. Max did not have a phone with him, but told Sergio that he would telephone the fire brigade as soon as he arrived back at the police station in about three minutes.

Max got chatting with a fellow officer outside the police station and temporarily forgot about making the call to the fire brigade. Ten minutes passed before he remembered. The fire brigade arrived at the scene 40 minutes after Max’s call. In normal traffic conditions it would have taken around 15 minutes to get to Sergio’s house. Evidence suggests that each period of delay (Max’s forgetfulness and the fire brigade’s slow response) has resulted in additional damage to the building.

The fire also damaged the house belonging to Sergio’s neighbour, Basil, who was on holiday in Greece at the time. Sergio had mentioned to Basil previously that his new lodger enjoyed a candlelit bath and he was concerned about the risk of fire. The lodger has since disappeared.

Advise Norma, Sergio and Basil on any negligence claims they may have, focusing solely on whether they may be owed a duty of care.

Was this document helpful?

Practice question Norma Basil and Sergio

Module: Law of Tort (LAW209)

523 Documents
Students shared 523 documents in this course
Was this document helpful?
LAW209 Week 3
Duty of Care Problem Question
‘Diner break-in and candles at bathtime’
Your advice has been sought in relation to the following incidents:
a) Norma owns a restaurant called the Double R Diner. Several weeks ago, PC Wiggum
arrested Snake in connection with a series of robberies perpetrated against restaurants in
Mallardshire. When PC Wiggum was putting Snake in the back of the police car, he carelessly
failed to lock the door, and when the car stopped at a traffic light on its way to the police
station, Snake escaped. The following night Snake broke into the Double R Diner. During the
break-in, Snake caused substantial property damage and injured Norma.
Terry, Norma’s husband, discovered his wife on the kitchen floor and rang for an ambulance.
The call handler told him ‘not to worry; and that an ambulance was ‘on its way.’ It took over an
hour for the ambulance to arrive, by which time Norma’s injuries had significantly worsened.
Snake’s whereabouts are currently unknown.
b) A fire broke out at Sergio’s home, after his new lodger left an aromatic candle unattended by
the bath before leaving the house.
Max, a police officer at the local police station around the corner, had popped out to buy
something for lunch when he saw Sergio run out of the front door onto the roadside and
smoke escaping from an upstairs window. Sergio had left his mobile phone inside. Max did
not have a phone with him, but told Sergio that he would telephone the fire brigade as soon
as he arrived back at the police station in about three minutes.
Max got chatting with a fellow officer outside the police station and temporarily forgot about
making the call to the fire brigade. Ten minutes passed before he remembered. The fire
brigade arrived at the scene 40 minutes after Max’s call. In normal traffic conditions it would
have taken around 15 minutes to get to Sergio’s house. Evidence suggests that each period
of delay (Max’s forgetfulness and the fire brigade’s slow response) has resulted in additional
damage to the building.
The fire also damaged the house belonging to Sergio’s neighbour, Basil, who was on holiday
in Greece at the time. Sergio had mentioned to Basil previously that his new lodger enjoyed a
candlelit bath and he was concerned about the risk of fire. The lodger has since disappeared.
Advise Norma, Sergio and Basil on any negligence claims they may have, focusing solely on
whether they may be owed a duty of care.