Skip to document

Socrates Apology Essay

Socrates Arguments In The Apology What Is Socrates Apology Socrates Ap...
Academic year: 2024/2025
Uploaded by:
0followers
30Uploads
120upvotes

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Socrates Arguments In The Apology

According to the majority of the jury members of Athens, Socrates is a corruption to the youth, doer of evil and does not agree with the gods of his people. In the Apology, written by Plato these are the assumptions and accusations Socrates is held in court for. In court, he is faced with what most men fear, being wrongly accused leading to the death sentence. Socrates argues and strives to prove that he has no fear of being hated, being accused of serious crimes, being threatened with punishment, or being put to death. One of the arguments that Socrates first shows throughout the Apology is that he is being guided by the work of his Gods. He says that he is not scared to be hated because he knows that many people in Athens only dislike.. more content... He knows that when he is put to death, they will be the ones at a loss of his knowledge and true wisdom. He still believes he has gained no reasons to think that he can lose in death as his acts were not for material gain (28–29). Socrates has shown no fear for being hated by the majority of Athens, yet still finds himself being accused of serious crimes leading to his death. Socrates has shown he has no fear in being accused of crimes he knows he didn't do. He gives explanation by saying that if you are accused of mothing you didn't do they accusers will be the ones in pain from the loss and wrong doing. He goes about explaining how he has never charged or tried to seek material good for his teachings, he only wanted to help people through their own wisdom. While in court they go through all of his accusations and Socrates has no struggle disproving his guilt and proving them wrong. He explains that the accusers offer no witnesses to the charge and even if they charged him he could not pay for it because he is poor (28). Socrates is a selfless man as seem through his actions that is only trying to prove his knowledge through wisdom and teachings. While in court Socrates was accused of not believing in the Gods of Athens. He goes on to explain that he does believe in the gods, he states that one cannot teach spiritual things without believing in the Gods themselves and cherishing their worth. He backs this up with the statement that

Get more content on StudyHub

Socrates Apology Essay

  1. Interrelation between a Critique of Craftsmen and Erixymachus Socrates' criticism of craftsmen or experts in Apology is a direct criticism of Erixymachus' speech in Symposium because Erixymachus' profession as a doctor, like that of a craftsman, is one that requires expertise in a certain field. Although craftsmen are knowledgeable in their craft, their sense of entitlement from their success causes them to think that they are "wise in other most important pursuits... [an] error [which] overshadowed the wisdom they had" (Apology 22E). Hence, Socrates thinks that one is better off with "neither [the craftsmen's] wisdom nor their ignorance" (Apology 22E). Like his fellow experts, Erixymachus has knowledge specific to medicine that he uses precariously to explain the entirety of love. Erixymachus agrees with Pausanius that love is made up of two distinct species, one good and one vulgar, but he adds that love "occurs everywhere in the universe... [and] directs everything that occurs" (Symposium 186B). He proceeds to ask for forgiveness in "giving pride of place to [his] own profession" (Symposium 186C), which parallels the pride of Socrates' craftsmen. Employing medicine as the basis of his argument, Erixymachus thinks that "our very bodies manifest the two species of love".. more content... Socrates' method (elenchus), is one that uses a system of question–and–answer or cross– examination. Elenchus often begins with the subject claiming to have a complete understanding of a term (usually one that is ethical). Socrates then questions the subject on his or her term in order to gain knowledge of the matter. The subject will find examples that support his or her definition of the term but fail to find the common ground to which makes the term apply. The subject then, is left with the realization that he or she does not understand the term at

Get more content on StudyHub

The Apology by Socrates

Apology, in Socrates day, stood for defense rather than seeking forgiveness, as it is now commonly used. To Socrates, it did not matter to him whether or not he was persecuted, as long as he did what was correct. Socrates whole philosophy is that to know knowledge is to have wisdom, and to have wisdom is to know oneself. The people of Athens did not like Socrates due to both the early accusers and late accusers; however, Socrates provides an argument to put these fallacies to rest. Plato's Apology is the story of Socrates defending himself against the charges placed upon him of corrupting the youth, not believing in the gods, and by making the lesser argument the stronger. Socrates argues that he became a Philosopher so that he could find what he was looking for, which is the search for human excellence. To Socrates, questioning is not skepticism, and he searches for the truth by asking questions to those who are known to have knowledge in society in hopes of finding true wisdom. While questioning those who proclaim to have knowledge, Socrates finds that these people are lacking, which provokes the townspeople to find Socrates a threat. Socrates Apology is about lying to rest the accusations of both the earlier and later accusers, while proving that all he was searching for is human excellence and truth, which he does not have, but in Socrates view is the main purpose and greatest achievement of life. In the Apology, Socrates begins his argument saying that he was brought

Get more content on StudyHub

Socrates 'The Apology'

The Apology is a piece of writing, where Socrates is addressing all of his accusers about the all of the wrongdoings that he has been accused of having a part in. The story starts off in a courtroom, where Socrates is addressing the men of Athens about the persuasive words of his accusers (Plato 1). Socrates states that he is a man of old age, being over seventy years old (1). He states that this trial is the first time he has ever been in a court of law, and he asks them to excuse any language that he may repeat (1). The Apology is a great piece of literature that gives the arguments of Socrates, in his defense, to the two accusation brought on him by his accusers. The first of the two charges brought against Socrates states that he disregards

Get more content on StudyHub

Socrates Apology

The Apology Of Socrates Ancient Greek had many exemplary thinkers called philosophers and Socrates was one of them. He imparted about knowledge, amity, and integrity as the Delphic Oracle declared Socrates as the wisest man in Athens. One of Socrates' students was a philosopher named Plato who wrote an Apology about Socrates. Socrates was wise in respect to the fact that he never accepted a "truth" that was told to him, without getting clear evidence to back it up. He made the realization that people believed in polytheistic religion without even knowing where their ideas came from. Athena was the most worshipped goddess among Athenians. Moreover, Ancient Greek formed city–states and all of them were independent but the most popular was the Athens. "Apology" begins with the speech in which Socrates makes his defense to the Athenian court at Agora and the voting for Socrates assassination were.. more content... Literally, thousands of books and other works of art have been devoted to him, yet his character and the tenets of his philosophy remain elusive. The book "The apology of Socrates" uses a very original style of writing to give readers an inside look into the life and wisdom of Socrates in his last days. However, I definitely found value in reading it for the sake of experiencing the powerful writing and ideas offered by Plato and Socrates. This book was a fantastic example of owning up to your beliefs, values, and standards. I'd recommend it to someone looking for a book that provides a stimulating intellectual experience. I really enjoyed getting insights into the structure of the Ancient Greek political and social systems. Plato make the Socrates comes alive in the books. The book "the trial and death of Socrates" has been very influential because this book provide both excellent points of entry into Plato's vast philosophy and vivid portrait of Plato's mentor–

Get more content on StudyHub

instead of being brought to trial. All you care about is hurting me. 2nd Charge Disses Old Gods, tosses props to New Gods S: Meletus, le me be sure that I understand this charge – do you claim I believe in New gods or in No Gods at all? M: You do not believe in any Gods at all! [Here Meletus is trying to make Socrates look bad] S: So I wonder what could 'New Gods' be? If New Gods are not really Gods, the can be people, so maybe they are like fairies and spirits. Can

Get more content on StudyHub

Apology Of Socrates Apology

The Apology of Socrates is actually not an apology at all. It is a statement made by Socrates in defense of his actions in court. Socrates was accused of not believing in the gods of Athens, and teaching the children of Athens to believe in other gods. These gods were suggested to be made up by Socrates himself ("Apology", 121). Socrates put himself in the jury's shoes by questioning his own behavior before the trial. He understood that they may be dumbfounded how his reputation could spiral down so quickly. Socrates still insisted; even after empathizing with the jury, that he had gained this reputation by falling victim of wisdom. Plato continued on with his remarks calling this wisdom "human wisdom". Soon Socrates warned that he was going

Get more content on StudyHub

Was this document helpful?

Socrates Apology Essay

Was this document helpful?
Socrates Arguments In The Apology
According to the majority of the jury members of Athens, Socrates is a corruption to the youth, doer
of evil and does not agree with the gods of his people. In the Apology, written by Plato these are the
assumptions and accusations Socrates is held in court for. In court, he is faced with what most men
fear, being wrongly accused leading to the death sentence. Socrates argues and strives to prove that
he has no fear of being hated, being accused of serious crimes, being threatened with punishment, or
being put to death. One of the arguments that Socrates first shows throughout the Apology is that he
is being guided by the work of his Gods. He says that he is not scared to be hated because he knows
that many people in Athens only dislike...show more content...
He knows that when he is put to death, they will be the ones at a loss of his knowledge and true
wisdom. He still believes he has gained no reasons to think that he can lose in death as his acts were
not for material gain (28–29). Socrates has shown no fear for being hated by the majority of Athens,
yet still finds himself being accused of serious crimes leading to his death. Socrates has shown he
has no fear in being accused of crimes he knows he didn't do. He gives explanation by saying that if
you are accused of mothing you didn't do they accusers will be the ones in pain from the loss and
wrong doing. He goes about explaining how he has never charged or tried to seek material good for
his teachings, he only wanted to help people through their own wisdom. While in court they go
through all of his accusations and Socrates has no struggle disproving his guilt and proving them
wrong. He explains that the accusers offer no witnesses to the charge and even if they charged him
he could not pay for it because he is poor (28). Socrates is a selfless man as seem through his actions
that is only trying to prove his knowledge through wisdom and teachings. While in court Socrates
was accused of not believing in the Gods of Athens. He goes on to explain that he does believe in
the gods, he states that one cannot teach spiritual things without believing in the Gods themselves
and cherishing their worth. He backs this up with the statement that
Get more content on StudyHub.Vip