Skip to document

Pol Sci Notes Ch 10

Introduction to Political Science notes for in-class session of chapte...
Course

Introduction to American Politics (Pol 101)

42 Documents
Students shared 42 documents in this course
Academic year: 2021/2022
Uploaded by:
110Uploads
20upvotes

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Pol Sci Notes Ch 10

The Judiciary

The American Legal Tradition:

  • Common Law Tradition
  • Relies on Precedent ● Stare decisis - Let the decision stand ● Adversarial System ● Litigious ● Types of Law: Criminal V. Civil
    • Criminal - illegal, murder, go to jail, defendent vs state / government
    • Civil - tort, person vs. person, car wreck

Powers of the Courts:

  • Constitution was intentionally vague about the powers of the Court system
  • Judicial Review ● Marbury V. Madison (1803)

The Exercise of Judicial Review:

  • Components of Judicial Review: ● Federal Courts can declare national, state, and local laws unconstitutional ● National laws or treaties are supreme when conflict with state of local laws ● Supreme Court is the final authority on the meaning of the Constitution

The Dual Court System:

  • Congress established the system in the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789
  • Dual System ● Federal ● State

Selection of Judges:

  • States: Method varies by state ● Appointments ● Elections ● Merit Plan ● Mix of appointments and election
  • Federal Constitution:

● When position comes up President appoints, Senate Confirms, lifetime appointment

  • Are we doing this the right way?

The Basics:

- 9 Judges - Public Tends to trust the Supreme Court more than the other institutions - Supposed to be above politics - 4 Key Political Methods ● How members are chosen ● How those members chose cases ● How they make decisions ● The effects of those decisions

Membership Selection:

- Merit - Political Ideology: ● Traditional Left-Right Dimension ● Constitutional Ideology

  • Strict Constructionism: ● A judicial approach holding that the Constitution should be read literally with the framers’ intentions uppermost in mind
  • Judicial Interpretivism: ● A judicial approach holding that the Constitution is a living document and that judges should interpret it according to the changing times and values

Membership Selection:

  • Reward
  • Representation
  • “Confirmability” ● Getting “borked” (named after a crazy person wanting a lifetime term)

Membership:

  • Conservatives: ● Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch?, Kavanaugh?, Barrett? ● Roberts
  • Liberals: ● Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor

Choosing the Cases:

Writing Opinions:

Opinion - written decision of the court that states the judgement of the majority

Concurring Opinions - Documents written by judges in the majority expressing agreement with the ruling but describing different or additional reasons

Dissenting Opinions - Documents written by judges in the minority expressing disagreement with the majority ruling

● All 3 types can be used as precedent in future decisions

Was this document helpful?

Pol Sci Notes Ch 10

Course: Introduction to American Politics (Pol 101)

42 Documents
Students shared 42 documents in this course
Was this document helpful?
Pol Sci Notes Ch 10
The Judiciary
The American Legal Tradition:
- Common Law Tradition
- Relies on Precedent
Stare decisis
- Let the decision stand
Adversarial System
Litigious
Types of Law: Criminal V. Civil
- Criminal - illegal, murder, go to jail, defendent vs state / government
- Civil - tort, person vs. person, car wreck
Powers of the Courts:
- Constitution was intentionally vague about the powers of the Court system
- Judicial Review
Marbury V. Madison (1803)
The Exercise of Judicial Review:
- Components of Judicial Review:
Federal Courts can declare national, state, and local laws unconstitutional
National laws or treaties are supreme when conflict with state of local laws
Supreme Court is the final authority on the meaning of the Constitution
The Dual Court System:
- Congress established the system in the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789
- Dual System
Federal
State
Selection of Judges:
- States: Method varies by state
Appointments
Elections
Merit Plan
Mix of appointments and election
- Federal Constitution: