- Information
- AI Chat
Was this document helpful?
Crashintome - Grade: A-
Course: Principles of English Composition II (ENGL 1213)
142 Documents
Students shared 142 documents in this course
University: University of Oklahoma
Was this document helpful?
Evaluative Argument
The movie, Crash, is viewed publicly acceptable because of how natural and
downplayed everything in the movie seems to be. This movie naturalizes racist
stereotypes in disguise as a way to inform people of the incorrect stereotypes. It presents
the problem that we have today, but with no way of fixing it. The central theme of the
film is simple: Everyone is prejudiced - black, white, Asian, Iranian and, we assume,
anyone from any other racial or ethnic group (Jensen). Crash is a bad movie because it
gives the impression that everyone acts a certain way and there is nothing we can do
about it.
The author belle hooks writes about prejudices that face the world today. She
relates them to certain times in history. She is known to site other books she has written
in her own articles. She often uses the term “white supremacist capitalist patriarchy” in
her writings. Hooks seems to be very upset about racism in the world, and that is
basically what she writes about most.
Bell hooks’ article suggests that white men in America see it natural that they are
superior to everyone else. She also suggests that everyone else agrees with the white
male attitude because the think they are supposed to. The movie Crash also does this in
way because it shows the white people in positions of power throughout the movie. It
also shows the people of different races in positions of poverty or struggle against another
race. For one, the black woman - played by Thandie Newton - is again powerless and
must be acted upon by the figure of white male authority (Smith).
Hooks uses the term “white supremacist capitalist patriarchy” to state that white
males have all the power. It at least suggests that they believe they have all the power. In