Skip to document

Benchmark Critical Incident Paper Assignment

Paper Assignment
Course

Couples and Family Counseling (COUN 645)

6 Documents
Students shared 6 documents in this course
Academic year: 2023/2024
Uploaded by:
0followers
17Uploads
0upvotes

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

BENCHMARK CRITICAL INCIDENT PAPER ASSIGNMENT

Identify: What is the issue? The issue with Jane’s scenario is that, as a counselor, she did not properly screen the potential participants for the group of teenage girls that she started: girls ages thirteen to fifteen. Due to the lack of screening, one of the participants had a history of depression, and Jane allowed her to participate in this group. This resulted in the participant going home and attempting to commit suicide after the session, and this girl's mother now blames counselor Jane for her daughter's suicide attempt. Summarize: The ACA Code of Ethics, looking at code A.2., states that if the client is a minor, the counselor must get written informed consent from the child's guardian before starting treatment. Jane did this so she would not violate the code of ethics. The ACA Code of Ethics, looking at code A.9, states that the counselor should screen their clients to see if the client's needs and goals match the group's overall needs and goals. Also, that section states that the clients' well-being should not jeopardize the group experience; however, counselors should take the necessary precautions to protect their clients. Act: What is the best course of action now and why? Jane did not break any of the ethical standards that were set. So, consulting with colleagues on how to move forward could be helpful. Jane should document everything to show that she has not violated any ethical codes and be able to provide the mother's written consent. Jane did not perform the screening properly, and while this had terrible consequences, it did not technically violate anything ethically. Jane could have also been doing ongoing screening to check on the clients after the group session, which could have prevented this situation. Jane is still responsible for this client, so she should give the client and her mother their opinions of counselors to whom she can be referred. Jane also needs to remove this client from the group, do assessments, and adequately screen the rest of the clients to ensure they do not happen again. This whole case comes down to a lack of appropriate screening, and while this is not ethically wrong, it should be used by Jane as a learning experience to ensure her screening improves in the future.

Was this document helpful?

Benchmark Critical Incident Paper Assignment

Course: Couples and Family Counseling (COUN 645)

6 Documents
Students shared 6 documents in this course
Was this document helpful?
BENCHMARK CRITICAL INCIDENT PAPER ASSIGNMENT
Identify: What is the issue?
The issue with Jane’s scenario is that, as a counselor, she did not properly screen the potential
participants for the group of teenage girls that she started: girls ages thirteen to fifteen. Due to the
lack of screening, one of the participants had a history of depression, and Jane allowed her to
participate in this group. This resulted in the participant going home and attempting to commit
suicide after the session, and this girl's mother now blames counselor Jane for her daughter's
suicide attempt.
Summarize:
The ACA Code of Ethics, looking at code A.2.a., states that if the client is a minor, the counselor
must get written informed consent from the child's guardian before starting treatment. Jane did
this so she would not violate the code of ethics. The ACA Code of Ethics, looking at code A.9.a,
states that the counselor should screen their clients to see if the client's needs and goals match the
group's overall needs and goals. Also, that section states that the clients' well-being should not
jeopardize the group experience; however, counselors should take the necessary precautions to
protect their clients.
Act: What is the best course of action now and why?
Jane did not break any of the ethical standards that were set. So, consulting with colleagues on
how to move forward could be helpful. Jane should document everything to show that she has
not violated any ethical codes and be able to provide the mother's written consent. Jane did not
perform the screening properly, and while this had terrible consequences, it did not technically
violate anything ethically. Jane could have also been doing ongoing screening to check on the
clients after the group session, which could have prevented this situation. Jane is still responsible
for this client, so she should give the client and her mother their opinions of counselors to whom
she can be referred. Jane also needs to remove this client from the group, do assessments, and
adequately screen the rest of the clients to ensure they do not happen again. This whole case
comes down to a lack of appropriate screening, and while this is not ethically wrong, it should be
used by Jane as a learning experience to ensure her screening improves in the future.