Skip to document
Welcome to StudocuSign in to access the best study resources
Guest user
0followers
HomeMy LibraryAsk AI
  • You don't have any recent items yet.
My Library
  • You don't have any courses yet.
  • You don't have any books yet.
  • You don't have any Studylists yet.

Evolution of agriculture (food production)

Very helpful
Course

BA (Hons.) History

999+ Documents
Students shared 6545 documents in this course
Academic year: 2022/2023
Uploaded by:
Anonymous Student
This document has been uploaded by a student, just like you, who decided to remain anonymous.
University of Delhi

Recommended for you

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Students also viewed

Related documents

Related Studylists

sofo

Preview text

Explain the relative influence of cultural and ecological factors in the advent of food production in the old world.

“Necessity is the mother of invention”, goes the old saying. Food production too if seen in this context can be said to have evolved out of necessity. The evolution of food production had been a complex process. The story of food production in the old world has been narrated in many ways by many people. Some more convincing, some less and some fighting a losing battle to growing number of evidences to support various other theories. Every theory that explains the advent of food production can be said to either support the cultural factors or the ecological factors, and some even both.

The first person who gave us a proper idea of how food production began was Gordon V Childe. His focus was mainly on the glaciations that occurred at around 10 000 B. He focused his theory mainly on the ecological changes. The explanation given by Childe was, that the desiccation that happened in the previously well watered regions, where the agriculture later evolved led to the creation of certain small patches of land on the banks of rivers like Nile, Euphrates and Tigris, that provided the stage setting for symbiosis between man, animals and plants. Thus leading to ‘domestication’. This was referred to as the Oasis hypothesis.

Robert Braidwood on the other hand did not support this idea. He said that the climate change after the Pleistocene was not significant enough to have brought about these changes. He argued that if that was the case then, agriculture could have evolved after the previous Pleistocenes. He talks about the cultural factor in this context. He gives the reasoning that, “Agriculture did not start earlier because culture was not ready to accept it”. Braidwood also attributes it to the development of apt technology to utilize the plants and hunt the animals effectively. He argued that certain plants and animals are found only in certain regions and an association was required between the humans, for the domestication to take place. This region where the association occurred was called the nuclear zone and the hypothesis aptly named the Nuclear Zone Hypothesis.

Lewis Binford rejects both Childe and Braidwood. He highlights Demographic stress as the main reason, behind the move towards food production. He criticizes Childe on the grounds that the climate change after the Pleistocene was not significant enough to produce any significant depletion in mega fauna. He further explains that if the number of people living in an environment multiplies to a level, that is difficult for the environment to sustain, then those living in the region will be seeking an alternate mode of subsistence. Such an ecological stress can be of two types:

-External Demographic Stress and

-Internal Demographic Stress

External Stress happens, when a group of people move into a region where there is a population already living and exploiting food resource. On the other hand internal stress happens when the population of a given region, grows to such an extent that it is no longer possible to sustain all of them, with the given amount of resources. Thomas Mayer was strong proponent of the Internal Demographic Stress theory. Wherever demographic zones intersected with the nuclear zones, agriculture started.

Now we look at the ideas put forward by another eminent researcher on this subject-Kent Flannery. Flannery rejects Childe, doesn’t accept Braidwood and is not convinced by Binford. He talked in terms of two distinct types of resource procurement systems:

  1. Positive feedback resource management System and

  2. Negative feedback resource management System

When the system expands, when exploited and thus allows deviation, it is called Positive feedback and when it contracts and counter acts deviation, it called Negative feedback. To put it in simple words, food production is Positive feedback and animal hunting is Negative feedback, and when Positive feedback is preferred over Negative feedback, agriculture arises. Flannery however doesn’t explain why this transition takes place.

Was this document helpful?

Evolution of agriculture (food production)

Course: BA (Hons.) History

999+ Documents
Students shared 6545 documents in this course

University: University of Delhi

Was this document helpful?
Explain the relative influence of cultural and ecological factors in the
advent of food production in the old world.
“Necessity is the mother of invention”, goes the old saying. Food production too if
seen in this context can be said to have evolved out of necessity. The evolution of
food production had been a complex process. The story of food production in the
old world has been narrated in many ways by many people. Some more
convincing, some less and some fighting a losing battle to growing number of
evidences to support various other theories. Every theory that explains the
advent of food production can be said to either support the cultural factors or
the ecological factors, and some even both.
The first person who gave us a proper idea of how food production began was
Gordon V Childe. His focus was mainly on the glaciations that occurred at
around 10 000 B.C. He focused his theory mainly on the ecological changes. The
explanation given by Childe was, that the desiccation that happened in the
previously well watered regions, where the agriculture later evolved led to the
creation of certain small patches of land on the banks of rivers like Nile,
Euphrates and Tigris, that provided the stage setting for symbiosis between man,
animals and plants. Thus leading to ‘domestication’. This was referred to as the
Oasis hypothesis.
Robert Braidwood on the other hand did not support this idea. He said that the
climate change after the Pleistocene was not significant enough to have brought
about these changes. He argued that if that was the case then, agriculture could
have evolved after the previous Pleistocenes. He talks about the cultural factor in
this context. He gives the reasoning that, “Agriculture did not start earlier
because culture was not ready to accept it”. Braidwood also attributes it to the
development of apt technology to utilize the plants and hunt the animals
effectively. He argued that certain plants and animals are found only in certain
regions and an association was required between the humans, for the
domestication to take place. This region where the association occurred was
called the nuclear zone and the hypothesis aptly named the Nuclear Zone
Hypothesis.

Students also viewed

Related documents