Skip to document
This is a Premium Document. Some documents on Studocu are Premium. Upgrade to Premium to unlock it.

JET Condensers VS Surface Condensers

Study Notes
Course

Mechanical Engineering (MECH201)

264 Documents
Students shared 264 documents in this course
Academic year: 2016/2017
Uploaded by:
130Uploads
30upvotes

Comments

Please sign in or register to post comments.

Preview text

Following table gives the comparison between the two types of condensers.

Jet Condensers

Surface Condensers

  1. Contact between steam and cooling water is direct. They form a mixture of condensate and water after heat exchange.

  2. Condensate is not fit for reuse as boiler feed water since circulating water contains impurities.

  3. Vacuum rarely exceeds 650 mm of mercury.

  4. Quantity of cooling water is less.

  5. Less maintenance cost.

  6. Low manufacturing cost.

  7. Requires less floor area.

  8. More auxiliary power required.

  9. Exhaust steam and cooling water do not come into contact directly. Condensate and circulating water never mix together.

  10. Condensate is quite fit for reuse as boiler feed water.

  11. Very high vacuum can be created. So higher plant efficiency.

  12. Larger quantity of water is required.

  13. Maintenance cost is high.

  14. High manufacturing cost.

  15. Requires large floor area.

  16. Less auxiliary power required.

Was this document helpful?
This is a Premium Document. Some documents on Studocu are Premium. Upgrade to Premium to unlock it.

JET Condensers VS Surface Condensers

Course: Mechanical Engineering (MECH201)

264 Documents
Students shared 264 documents in this course
Was this document helpful?

This is a preview

Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all pages
  • Access to all documents

  • Get Unlimited Downloads

  • Improve your grades

Upload

Share your documents to unlock

Already Premium?
Following table gives the comparison between the two types of condensers.
Jet Condensers
Surface Condensers
1. Contact between steam and cooling
water is direct. They form a mixture of
condensate and water after heat
exchange.
2. Condensate is not fit for reuse as boiler
feed water since circulating water
contains impurities.
3. Vacuum rarely exceeds 650 mm of
mercury.
4. Quantity of cooling water is less.
5. Less maintenance cost.
6. Low manufacturing cost.
7. Requires less floor area.
8. More auxiliary power required.
1. Exhaust steam and cooling water do not
come into contact directly. Condensate
and circulating water never mix together.
2. Condensate is quite fit for reuse as boiler
feed water.
3. Very high vacuum can be created. So
higher plant efficiency.
4. Larger quantity of water is required.
5. Maintenance cost is high.
6. High manufacturing cost.
7. Requires large floor area.
8. Less auxiliary power required.