- Information
- AI Chat
Was this document helpful?
Intro to Culture Bound Syndromes
Course: Psychology
999+ Documents
Students shared 2321 documents in this course
University: Far Eastern University
Was this document helpful?
November 1, 2001
Psychiatric Times. Vol. 18 No. 11
Introduction to Culture-Bound Syndromes
Ronald C. Simons, M.D., M.A.
In the glossary of our book The Culture-Bound Syndromes, Charles C. Hughes, Ph.D., listed almost 200 folk
illnesses that have, at one time or another, been considered culture-bound syndromes (Simons and Hughes,
1986). Many have wonderfully exotic and evocative names: Arctic hysteria, amok, brain fag, windigo. Some of
the more common syndromes are described in the Table. These diagnostic entities, both individually and
collectively, have been the subject of a large and contentious body of literature. Are they best explained within
the conceptual framework of Western psychiatry, or are they best explained anthropologically as manifestations
of structural and functional elements operating in the societies in which they are found?
In the introductory comments to the glossary, Hughes pointed out that it is impossible to produce a definitive
list of this group of diagnostic entities (Simons and Hughes, 1986). It is unclear exactly what sort of things
should be included. How about reports of possession and trance states, which often had local names? Should
descriptively similar patterns of behavior or experience from different cultures be lumped together or split
apart? What can reasonably be called an illness, and what is better considered a set of customary beliefs and
practices of an entirely different order? Hughes concluded that the term culture-bound syndrome "still has
currency but little discriminable [i.e., operationally definable] content" (Simons and Hughes, 1986).