- Information
- AI Chat
Was this document helpful?
IVK Case 5 Reflection- for The Adventures of an IT Leader book
Course: Management of Information Technology
7 Documents
Students shared 7 documents in this course
University: University of the Philippines System
Was this document helpful?
IVK Case 5 Reflection
Chapter 14:
1. Should acquisition of infrastructure replacement services be an arms-length transaction or
a close partnership transaction?
A close partnership transaction is preferable to an arms-length transaction
for IVK. The chapter goes into detail on earlier ServoLith experience, which does not
sound like it would be a suitable fit for IVK. Essentially, IVK wanted the best and chose
ServoLith as a result. Because ServoLith hadn’t given priority to IVK, this bold move put
IVK in a terrible spot, and complications occurred as a result of the relationship. IVK
requires the services of a sufficiently sized service provider capable of prioritizing IVK and
delivering results. IVK was working with a service firm that was much out of their league,
and while their objectives of finding the best were good, the results were less than ideal,
necessitating a close partnership.
2. Which vendor, contract structure, and service delivery model should IVK choose?
VerxaWeb, in my opinion, is the greatest option because they can provide
excellent service. Because of their more responsive nature, they would be a lot better
match for IVK.
3. How important is “control” to a company like IVK when outsourcing IT? How should
control be maintained?